News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Business 
 State government backs down on E10 proposal 

State government backs down on E10 proposal

06 Feb, 2012 07:53 AM
THE state government has backed down on their plan to ban regular unleaded fuel after being advised it could lead to higher petrol prices for motorists.

The government’s plan was to dump regular unleaded and replace it with a 10 per cent ethanol blend or ‘E10’ by July 1 this year.

“Motorists already pay enough for petrol and I am not going to force people into buying more expensive premium petrol to run their cars,” premier Barry O’Farrell told The Herald.

Ethanol is a type of alcohol produced through the fermentation of grain, corn or sugarcane.

Mixed with petrol, it is a cleaner burning fuel that produces less greenhouse gases than unleaded petrol.

However it is not recommended for use in pre-1986 vehicles or those fitted with a carburettor, due to potential material incompatibility and hot fuel handling problems.

Armidale mechanic and president of New England Hot Rods and Customs, Greg Love, said he simply could not use E10 on any of his vehicles.

“There is no way in the world they would run on E10,” he said.

“We just don’t use it at all, we have high performance vehicles and they need the high octane to fire properly.

“The only thing we use it (E10) for is to clean parts occasionally.”

Modelling by the University of Queensland and the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce, obtained by The Herald, shows 25 per cent of cars in NSW cannot use ethanol fuel and would have been forced to use premium fuel instead.

The government’s backflip means these motorists will not have to pay up to 15 cents more per litre for their petrol.

Mr Love said cars that are made recently, specifically Ford, are made to run on E10, but older cars vary with the fuel they need to run.

“It just really varies with cars, some of the older standard cars are made for a lower octane, so premium is not good for them,” he said.

“But they still wouldn’t run well on E10.”

“They (the government) should just leave it alone, because they have the choice to buy whatever they need or want now and that’s how it should be.”

The government will still back an ethanol mandate, under which oil companies must ensure 6 per cent of the fuel they sell is ethanol.

Mr Love, who specialises in Hot Rods from before 1948, said it would have been no great drama for him to lose regular unleaded because he prefers the premium fuel.

“We would pay the extra for premium unleaded fuel anyway,” he said

“You actually get further out of your tank with premium 98 fuel.

“I think people wonder about the cost factor upfront but over a long period of time there is not much difference in price, you get better fuel economy and it is better for your car.

“We even put premium in our lawn mowers.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Armidale Express







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...